Powered by Bravenet Bravenet Blog

Sunday, May 11th 2008

10:44 AM

Kansas to Sell off "Freedom's Frontier" ?


From outsourcing bureaucracies, to firing museum directors, the Freedom's Frontier National Heritage Area project, based out of Lawrence , Kansas has had its share of controversy.

Perhaps the most telling piece of evidence yet, that Freedom's Frontier is not about preserving history, but securing $10,000,000 for a "heritage grant" that would threaten not only Missouri (and now seemingly Kansas history as well) but the property rights in both states.

It looks like I was right on track when my article, "Lawrence, KS Economic Woes Real Motive Behind Freedom's Frontier? " was published on Jan. 27, 2008 on the Op Ed News website.

A Letter to the Editor published in the Topeka Capital-Journal published on May 4 , 2008, confirms what I and many others have been saying for quite some time.

While the backers of Freedom's Frontier in Lawrence have been portraying that it is an effort to "preserve" history, the author of the letter,PAUL M. BAHNMAIER of LeCompton, Ks writes...

"I was shocked when I read in The Capital-Journal that a member of the Kansas Legislature, a Mission Hills senator, proposed selling the state historic sites.

To sell our history is to sell our souls.

It was suggested that a panel be appointed to determine the importance of the state historic sites. Be assured that although this may not happen now, once this seed is sown it will surely grow.

I would like to propose to this future panel that it consider selling not the historic sites, but the land surrounding the Kansas Museum of History in Topeka, and even the museum itself, before it considers selling off the historic sites located throughout Kansas. The museum is merely a new, modern structure of no particular historical significance.

However, the sites are buildings where historic events occurred and people made history. Many of these historic sites are more than 150 years old, are National Historic Landmarks and are partners in the Freedom's Frontier National Heritage Area.

Tourism is one of the leading industries in America, and our Kansas historic sites play a major role in attracting state, national and international visitors to Kansas to learn about our great history. Kansas history is not for sale to the highest bidder."

So why would the State of Kansas want to sell off historic sites that are partners in the Freedom's Frontier National Heritage Area?

My guess is that it has always been about the money and not Kansas history and certainly not Missouri history.

They have the necessary partners signed up for Freedom's Frontier, to portray wide support for the project, but as from the begining, the only real support for the project is limited to Lawrence and the eastern Kansas area.

Freedom's Frontier is about securing $10,000,000 for Lawrence, Ks. This should serve as a warning to historic sites in southern and western Kansas, as well as western Missouri who have decided to become "partners" in Freedom's Frontier.

Allying yourself with those who have promised to promote tourism and preserve your historic sight might be the one thing that destroys it.

Clint, Missouri Bushwhacker

mobushwhacker@yahoo.com

 

1 comment(s) / leave a comment

Saturday, May 10th 2008

5:05 PM

Kenya Missionaries Call Barack Obama "Muslim" , "Racist"...


From the "No Mo Reparations" blog...

Message from Kenya Missionaries about Barack Obama

The following was found in the Truth in History newsletter and was sent to them from missionaries in Kenya. While No Mo Reparations does not agree with all of the ideals / opinions expressed or published in the newsletter, we have to admit, they often come through with a "slam dunk" that you will not find or here of anywhere else.
 
"From: spiker [mailto:spiker@spiker.biz] Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 12:00 AMTo: Recipient list suppressed:
Subject:
 
Message from Missionaries in Kenya about Obama

Celeste and Loren Davis are Missionaries in Africa and can shed some light on one of our Presidential candidates.Thanks for sending out an alert about Obama. We are living and working in Kenya for almost twelve years now and know his family (tribe) well. They are the ones who were behind the recent Presidential election chaos here. Thousands of people have been displaced by election violence (over 350,000) and I don't know the last count of the dead. Obama under "friends of Obama" gave almost a million dollars to the opposition campaign who just happened to be his cousin, Raila Odinga, who is a socialist trained in east Germany. He has been trying to bring Kenya down for years and the last president threw him in prison for trying to subvert this country! December 27th elections brought cries from ODM (Odinga Camp) of a rigged election. Obama and Raila speak daily. As we watch Obama rise in the US we are sure that whatever happens, he will use the same tactic, crying rigged election if he doesn't win and possibly cause a race war in America.What we would like you to know is what the American press has been keeping a dirty little secret. Obama IS a Muslim and he IS a racist and this is a fulfillment of the 911 threat that was just the beginning. Jihad is the only true Muslim way. We have been working with them for 20 years this July! He is not an American as we know it. Please encourage your friends and associates not to be taken in by those that are promoting him. It is world wide jihad. All our friends in Europe are very disturbed by the Muslim infiltration into their countries. By the way, his true name is Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama. Won't that sound sweet to our enemies as they swear him in on the Koran!"
0 comment(s) / leave a comment

Wednesday, May 7th 2008

8:57 AM

Anti-Real ID Act Legislation Clears Senate Committee...

Jim Guest

Rep. Jim Guest's Anti-Real ID legislation cleared the Missouri Senate Committee On Judiciary And Civil And Criminal Jurisprudence two days ago {May 5th}.

No doubt all of the calls that were placed to the Senate Committee paid off, I have been informed that over 7000 calls were placed in support of Rep. Guest paid off.

The bill now goes to the rest of the Missouri Senate for a vote.

Once again we will need everyone to call their state senators to show that we support Representative Guest's  Anti-Real ID legislation.

You can look up your state representative by visiting Congress.Org

Clint, Mobushwhacker

clintlacy2@yahoo.com

 


0 comment(s) / leave a comment

Friday, May 2nd 2008

2:09 PM

Governor Blunt Attempting to Block Rep. Jim Guest's Anti-Real I.D. Legislation...

BREAKING NEWS..

This just in from our Reader Mail Bag...

Hello,

Gov. Blunt has sent word out to stop Jim Guest REAL ID legislation. We
need to help Jim stop Gov. Blunt. "Stopping the Real I.D. Act = Stopping
the North American Union" Jim's Bill has passed the MO House of
Representatives 193-3. It would take a lot of gall not to get the bill out
of Committee.

I talked to Jim's Chief of Staff and she told me that the bill is now in
the Judiciary Committee in the Senate. This bill has to make it out of
committee to be voted on by the full MO Senate. Everyone who believes in a
sovereign MO needs to call the members on the Judiciary Committee right
now and tell them to Vote yes on the Bill and get it out of committee.
Here is a list of Judiciary Committee members.  Remember that your
children are counting on you to take a stand.


God Bless,
Frank Dunnington


Missouri State Senate
Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee

MEMBERS:
Matt Bartle, 8th, Chair (573) 751-1464
Jack Goodman, 29th, Vice-Chair (573) 751-2234
John Loudon, 7th (573) 751-9763
Rob Mayer, 25th (573) 751-3859
Delbert Scott, 28th (573) 751-8793
Chuck Graham, 19th (573) 751-2162
Jolie Justus, 10th (573) 751-2788
Chris Koster, 31st (573) 751-1430



Missouri Senator Charlie Shields: 573.751.9476
Missouri Senator Michael Gibbons: 573.751.2853

New Missouri bill thumbs its nose at federal Real ID Act
By Lee Logan
POST-DISPATCH JEFFERSON CITY BUREAU
01/18/2008

JEFFERSON CITY — Missouri would defy federal drivers licensing
requirements in the name of privacy under a bill filed by a crusading
legislator Thursday.

Sponsored by Rep. Jim Guest, the bill would prohibit Missouri from
complying with the Real ID Act of 2005.

Responding to security concerns after Sept. 11, Congress passed the
program, which sets common licensing rules that essentially make it harder
to falsely obtain a drivers license.

Since then, Guest, a Republican from King City in northwest Missouri, has
been rounding up other states to oppose the law based on privacy concerns.

"We have a federal government that is out of control," Guest said.

The Legislature overwhelmingly passed a resolution asking the federal
government to repeal the program last year; Guest's bill would go a step
further by prohibiting the state from participating in the program
entirely.

Guest said he has no problem with a common set of standards for drivers
licenses, but he's worried about the provisions that require
"machine-readable" technology in the cards, which could leave personal
information in the wrong hands.

"It will make ID theft very easy in the future," he said.

Because Real ID would be required for so many common tasks, Guest said it
amounts to a national identification card.

"Almost everybody would be affected by it," he said. "It is the first step
to Big Brother watching you."

Nationally, the movement against Real ID has sparked wide-ranging fears
that the next step might be microchipping citizens, or that the cards have
a connection to the biblical prophesy of the "mark of the beast."

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security says the program provides a
much-needed security boost, and that the department has worked with states
on implementation.

"There's been a public outcry for more secure identification," department
spokesman Russ Knocke said.

If a state decides not to comply, its citizens would be unable to use
their drivers license to fly on airplanes and would need additional
documentation, such as a passport.

The rules are set to take effect in May, though states have until December
2009 to fully implement the program.

The Missouri Department of Revenue would have to implement the licensing
rules, which were released to states last week.

Spokesman David Griffith said the department is still reviewing the rules
to determine the impact on Missouri. One of the key questions, he said, is
calculating the program's cost for the state.

The Homeland Security department has estimated that the program will cost
at least $3.9 billion nationwide.

More than 20 states have passed legislation or resolutions opposing the
program, including several that have passed laws saying they will not
participate — essentially calling the feds' bluff.

Despite the outcry, a few state legislators think Real ID isn't such a big
deal.

Rep. Clint Zweifel, D-Florissant, was one of three lonely legislators to
vote against the resolution last year.

"I just don't like the idea of thumbing your nose at a pretty modest
security recommendation," he said, noting that the program was suggested
by the bipartisan Sept. 11 commission.



 

 


0 comment(s) / leave a comment

Monday, April 28th 2008

8:14 PM

Kicking the Ostrich


Too many Southerner's these days have the attitude of an Ostrich. Rather than take a stand and defend their heritage, they would rather bury their head in the sand than hold an elected official responsible for their actions.

Too many Southerner's feel it is more important to support their political party than their heritage and are more than willing to let their heritage die by the wayside because they feel that social issues or taxes, or foreign policy is more important. Their battle cry is , "Leave politics out of it!".

But we know that to any Southern man or woman who cares about their heritage, this is impossible. For those who might happen to echo the pacification theory of "Leave politics out of it", ask yourself this; Who has attacked our heritage and has taken down our flags? Was it not politicians ? Who refused to restore our flags? Was it not politicians?

Below is a letter that I have submitted to the editor of Confederate Veteran magazine which addresses this very subject:

Politics are part of our heritage:
 
To the editor:
 
The March / April issue of Confederate Veteran magazine carried a Letter to the Editor from Mr. Keith Wilson of the General Sterling Price Camp # 145.
 
In the letter Mr. Wilson takes a Mr. Grady Smith from the Cranbury (Tx) Camp 427 to task for criticizing then Governor (now President) George W. Bush for allowing the Confederate Plaques to be removed from the Texas Supreme Court Building .
 
Mr. Wilson accuses Mr. Smith of “Bush bashing”, yet admits what happened with the plaques was wrong and then goes on to ask the question; “What difference does it make who was governor?”
 
It makes a difference because whoever was Governor was in a position to either preserve our heritage, or bow to political correctness and let our heritage be destroyed. In this case the Governor was George W. Bush. It is not “Bush bashing” to bring to attention, who was responsible for this action (or inaction), it is fact.
 
Mr. Wilson suggests that the Editor should not have published Mr. Smith’s letter and that Mr. Smith should not have brought “party politics” into the discussion stating that it “would have been the honorable thing to do”.
 
Politics is part of our struggle, it always has been and it always will be. Our short-lived Confederacy was born out of the struggle perpetrated by radical Northeastern-Puritans Yankees imposing their politics on the Missouri-Kansas border nearly a decade before the rest of the nation felt the wrath of war.
 
Politics played a major role in Reconstruction, which was the beginning of the cultural genocide that still plagues our country (through politics) to this day.
 
Politics most certainly played a major role in Missouri Governor Bob Holden’s decision to remove the Confederate Battle Flag from Higginsville Confederate Cemetery and the 2’cd National Flag from Fort Davidson State Historic Site in Pilot Knob, Missouri .
 
Politics most certainly played a role in Missouri Governor Matt Blunt’s decision not to permanently restore the flags, (which he could have done at any given time).
 
As my older brother put it , (in regards to Higginsville) , “Holden took down the flags, Blunt cut down the pole”.
 
It is funny that many were very vocal when Holden (a Democrat) took down  the flags, yet many remained astonishingly silent when Blunt (a Republican) not only made sure they never went back up , but did his part to deliver Missouri’s history to Kansas, via the Freedom’s Frontier National Heritage Area.
 
Mr. Smith did do the honorable thing, by standing up and trying to hold an elected official accountable for his actions.
 
The dishonorable thing to do is sit on one's hands, (as apparently Mr. Wilson has chosen to do).
 
Clint E. Lacy
Missouri Sons of Confederate Veterans
2 comment(s) / leave a comment

Sunday, April 27th 2008

8:08 AM

Thug Life: Al Sharpton Vows to Shutdown New York

From the No Mo Reparations Blog:

Thug Life: Sharpton Vows to Shutdown New York




"NEW YORK (AP) - Hundreds of angry people marched through Harlem on Saturday after the Rev. Al Sharpton promised to "close this city down" to protest the acquittals of three police detectives in the 50-shot barrage that killed a groom on his wedding day and wounded two friends.
"We strategically know how to stop the city so people stand still and realize that you do not have the right to shoot down unarmed, innocent civilians," Sharpton told an overflow crowd of several hundred people at his National Action Network office in the historically black Manhattan neighborhood. "This city is going to deal with the blood of Sean Bell."
Sharpton was joined by the family of 23-year-old Sean Bell - a black man - and a friend of Bell who was wounded in the 2006 shooting outside a Queens strip club. Two of the three officers charged were also black.
The rally at Sharpton's office was followed by a 20-block march down Malcolm X Boulevard and then across 125th Street, Harlem's main business thoroughfare, where some bystanders yelled out "Kill the police!"


As I recall watching the news the other day a judge aquitted all three officers in the shooting but that doesn't matter to Shartpon. Nope he's now leading a crowd up Malcom X (another so called civil rights leader) Blvd, that is yelling kill the police!

In the previously cited article Sharpton is quotes as saying:


"They never accused Sean Bell of doing anything. Then why is he dead?" Sharpton asked, his voice roaring with anger. Authorities "have shown now that they will not hold police accountable. Well, guess what? If you won't, we will!"


Excellent point Al! Accountability, now that is a real concept. Say , Al, while we're on the subject, when are you ever going to be held accountable for Freddy's Fashion Mart?


What you've never heard of Freddy's Fashion Mart? Well let me tell you something baby, in 1995 Al Shartpon payed Freddy's Fashion Mart a visit and he was open for business! According to Wikipedia.Org...


"In 1995, a black Pentecostal Church, the United House of Prayer, which owned a retail property on 125th Street, asked Fred Harari, a Jewish tenant who operated Freddie's Fashion Mart, to evict his longtime subtenant, a black-owned record store called The Record Shack. Sharpton led a protest in Harlem against the planned eviction of The Record Shack.[41][42][43] Sharpton told the protesters, "We will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business."[44] On 1995-12-08, Roland J. Smith Jr., one of the protesters, entered the store with a gun and flammable liquid, shot several customers and set the store on fire. The gunman fatally shot himself, and seven store employees died of smoke inhalation.[45][46] Fire Department officials discovered that the store's sprinkler had been shut down, in violation of the local fire code.[47] Sharpton claimed that the perpetrator was an open critic of himself and his nonviolent tactics. Sharpton later expressed regret for making the racial remark, "white interloper," and denied responsibility for inflaming or provoking the violence.[12][48]"


Yes sir, denying responsibility, that's some accountability all right. The same Wikipedia article citied above also contains information about the Crown Heights riot, that happened in 1991...


"The Crown Heights Riot began on August 19, 1991, after a car driven by a Jewish man, and part of a procession led by an unmarked police car, went through an intersection and was struck by another vehicle causing it to veer onto the sidewalk where it accidentally struck and killed a seven-year-old Guyanese boy named Gavin Cato and severely injured his cousin Angela. Witnesses could not agree upon the speed and could not agree whether the light was yellow or red. One of the factors that sparked the riot was the arrival of a private ambulance which, on the orders of a police officer worried for the Jewish driver's safety, removed the uninjured driver from the scene while Cato lay pinned under his car.[34] Cato and his cousin were treated soon after by a city ambulance. Caribbean-American and African-American residents of the neighborhood rioted for four consecutive days fueled by rumors that the private ambulance had refused to treat Cato.[34][35] During the riot blacks looted stores,[34] beat Jews in the street,[34] and clashed with groups of Jews, hurling rocks and bottles at one another [36] after Yankel Rosenbaum, a visiting student from Australia, was stabbed and killed by a member of a mob shouting "Kill the Jew."[37] Sharpton, who arranged a rally in Crown Heights after Cato's death,[34] has been seen by some commentators as inflaming tensions by making remarks that included "If the Jews want to get it on, tell them to pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house"[38] and referring to Jews as "diamond merchants."[39] Sharpton marched through Crown Heights and in front of "770", shortly after the riot, with about 400 protesters (who chanted "Whose streets? Our streets!" and "No justice, no peace!"), in spite of Mayor David Dinkins' attempts to keep the march from happening.[40]"



Again, where's the accountability Al? I bet you can't guess who is good friends with Reverand Sharpton....



That's wright, oops I mean, that's right Barack Obama, the candidate for "Change", who appears to have developed a pattern of befriending racist, anti-semetic ministers. Now that's Wright below.















Once again, I turned to Wikipedia and struck gold...

"In March 2008, a controversy broke out concerning Barack Obama's long-term relationship with Wright, his former pastor and religious mentor.[27][28] ABC News found several racially and politically charged sermons by Wright, including his suggestion that past U.S. policies were partially responsibile for the September 11 attacks, his statement, "God bless America... No!... God Damn America...for killing innocent people...for treating her citizens as less than human," and his assertion that "the government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color."[29][30] Some of Wright's statements were widely interpreted as being deeply offensive...


Wright has been quoted as saying: "When [Obama’s] enemies find out that in 1984 I went to Tripoli [to visit Muammar al-Gaddafi] with [Louis] Farrakhan, a lot of his Jewish support will dry up quicker than a snowball in hell."[


Wright, also married Barack and his wife Michelle, as well as, baptized their children. It is interesting that Wright mentioned Louis Farrakhan. Farrakhan is another Black Supremacist "reverand" who is associated with Barack Obamba.

Again, quoting Wikipedia:

"Louis Farrakhan (born Louis Eugene Walcott, May 11, 1933), is the acting head of the Nation of Islam (NOI) as the National Representative of Elijah Muhammad. He is also well-known as an advocate for African American interests and a critic of American society. Farrakhan currently resides in Kenwood, an affluent neighborhood on the south side of Chicago, and part time at a Nation of Islam farm in New Buffalo, Michigan.


Farrakhan has been the center of much controversy, and critics contend that some of his views and comments have been
racist, homophobic, and antisemitic"

According to the Nation of Islam website:

"The Nation of Islam under the leadership of the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan is the catalyst for the growth and development of Islam in America"

Oh yeah, I almost forgot. Farrakhan endorsed Barack Obama for President. Barack Obama has based his candidacy on "Change". Based on who he chooses to associate with, I'd say "Change" is coming all right. 

Mr. Obama; is this the type of "Change" we can expect from you?


Oh never mind!




 
0 comment(s) / leave a comment

Saturday, April 26th 2008

7:02 PM

Coffee Camp Dinner Features Famous Historian...


The program for the Seventh Annual Col. John T. Coffee Camp, Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV), Confederate Heritage Dinner in Osceola, Missouri, was held on the evening of Saturday April 5th. The largest crowd to ever hear author Donald Gilmore turned out for the annual event. Gilmore, a senior editor at the Ft. Leavenworth Combat Studies Institute, delivered a spirited forty-five minute talk which culminated in a standing ovation by an appreciative crowd. The speech was based on his new book, “The Civil War on the Missouri/Kansas Border."

The dinner and talk are part of the Col. John T. Coffee Camp’s ongoing education program.

In his talk Gilmore asserted that the war on the Missouri/Kansas border was the beginning of the War Between the States, which then spread eastward to the rest of the South. He talked about the premeditated nature of the War which was encouraged by economic interests in the Northeast who wanted to destabilize Missouri.

Speaking directly about the burning of Osceola in 1861, he showed it was an extension of what had been happening for over half a decade. He also talked about the bravery of those Missourians who resisted the Northern invasion and suffered terrible depredations during and after the War.

Another highlight of this year’s dinner was the drawing organized by Friends of the Coffee Camp, the proceeds going to monument projects. Jared Lawler of Clinton, Missouri, donated a .36 caliber Kentucky Long Rife, and it was won by Jason Coffman of Holt, Missouri. An original framed oil painting entitled “Gen. Sterling Price’s Sac River Camp," by artist Carol Kampe of Clinton, Missouri, was won by Cindy Vickers, also of Clinton.

The master of ceremonies was Coffee Camp Commander Gary Ayres, and Press Officer David S. Reif introduced Mr. Gilmore.

The dinner attracted participants from three states with a number of notables attending. Among them were Greene County Archivist Mr. Robert Newmann, Ron Paul delegates Mr. and Mrs. James Bradley of Trimble, Ron Paul delegate Mr. Scott Easter of Savannah, and former Lake Ozark alderman, Paul Garrison, accompanied by his family.

Benediction and prayers were led by Pastor Robert Phillips of Dunnegan.

The annual dinner is a public event attracting large numbers of non-SCV members.

I was happy that I was able to attend yet another Coffee Camp Annual Heritage Dinner. What a great speaker, historian and author Mr. Gilmore is!

While I do my best to keep you the reader apprised of what is going on in Kansas and fighting the liberals in Lawrence, I would like to take the time to remind everyone, that despite everything that is going on right now in regards to the Freedom's Frontier National Heritage Area, we do have friends on "the other side of the line".

I had the pleasure of being seated next to the boys from the South Kansas Camp #2064 Sons of Confederate Veterans , based out of Wichita.

It was a pleasure meeting all of you gentlemen.

Clint, Missouri Bushwhacker

mobushwhacker@yahoo.com

0 comment(s) / leave a comment

Sunday, April 20th 2008

10:03 PM

Brownback selling Freedom's Frontier to cover up his role in the loss of 4000 Kansas Boeing Jobs...

A March 1'st , 2008 article published in the Washington Times , entitled, "Boeing Loses Bid to Build Tankers to Its Rival" stated :

"The Pentagon yesterday passed over Boeing's bid for a $40 billion contract to build a fleet of refueling tankers for the Air Force, instead choosing a team that includes Boeing's European rival Airbus.

The team of Northrop Grumman and European Aeronautic Defence and Space (EADS), Airbus's parent company, will build an initial fleet of 179 tankers. The contract to supply the tankers had initially been awarded to Boeing, but was withdrawn in 2004 over a procurement scandal that resulted in officials from Boeing and the Air Force being sent to prison.

For EADS, Boeing's rival in the commercial aviation industry, winning means getting a foot in the door of the U.S. military aircraft business. For Boeing, losing means that its 767 line will probably be shut down at some point as commercial sales for the plane decline. "

Great, just what this country needs, more jobs leaving during a time in which jobs are scarce and the dollar is falling.

Times have been especially tough for the aircraft industry, and it looks like times are going to be even tougher now that the EADS corporation has gotten their foot into the American military market.

A March 24, 2008 posting on Business News.Com ("Air Force tankers fly on borrowed time" ) stated that:

"The tanker deal would have meant 3,800 jobs in Wichita { if Boeing } had won the contract. "He has made it abundantly clear that, if president, he would be indifferent to the outsourcing of American jobs, even at a time when our families and our nation's economy are hurting the most," said Larry Gates, chairman of the Kansas Democratic Party"

According to the March 18, 2008 issue of the Wichata Eagle, U.S. Senator Sam Brownback (R) Kansas, told a group of Wichata business leaders that the EADS corporation has an unfair advantage in obtaining the tanker contract...

"Standing with a bar graph depicting billions of dollars in foreign government subsidies to a consortium of European aircraft companies, Sen. Sam Brownback on Monday stressed that a massive tanker contract must be overturned.

It was the latest in a string of harsh criticism of the Air Force's decision to award a $35 billion contract to the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co., Airbus' parent company, and Northrop Grumman, instead of to the Boeing Co., to build the next generation of aerial-refueling tankers.

Brownback said U.S. government figures show the European companies received $5 billion in subsidies that were intended to jump-start their commercial aircraft program. Now that subsidy is undercutting an American company on a military contract, Brownback told about 150 people at a downtown Rotary lunch at the Broadview Hotel.

'Do you think Boeing could launch a good aircraft with $5 billion?' he asked.

The crowd of business leaders and government officials applauded loudly when Brownback said the contract decisions should be overturned.

Brownback said the tanker deal 'popped us right in the jaw' in Kansas. He later noted that he is working with other officials to determine the full economic impact of losing the contract.

'I'm still mad about this,' he said"

That's odd, because just five days prior to addressing Wichata business leaders, the Kansas City Star in a March 23, 2008 article entitled :

"Questionable tanker deal could cloud November election for Republicans in affected states" had this to say about the lost Boeing contract:

"WASHINGTON Some Kansans furious and mystified over the demise of a Boeing bid to replace the Air Force’s aging armada of aerial tankers think they detect John McCain’s fingerprints.

The senator from Arizona says the decision was the Pentagon’s and that he had nothing to do with it other than to ask for fair competition, for taxpayer money not to be wasted and military effectiveness not impaired.

Boeing allies, however, point to the former Airbus lobbyists on the Republican’s campaign staff and the political contributions from the company. They question an amendment he championed opening military bids to foreign manufacturers, his letters to the Defense Department pushing to ensure Boeing wasn’t the lone airplane maker being considered and his call to ignore European subsidies to Airbus."

(So much for McCain's pledge not to bow to "special interests" )

The article also reveals that:

"in 2003, when Congress approved his amendment that allowed the Pentagon to buy American military equipment from foreign companies. Sens. Pat Roberts and Sam Brownback, both Kansas Republicans, voted for the amendment along a largely party line.

And in 2006, McCain wrote letters to the Defense Department suggesting the criteria be broadened and the issue of European subsidies to Airbus not be a deal breaker. Opponents said the senator was lobbying on Airbus’ behalf, but McCain said he was merely calling for an open bidding process.

McCain’s backers think his moves benefited America: “All the senator advocated for was 100 percent full competition, and that’s it,” said Keith Ashdown of Taxpayers for Common Sense

Republican anger is publicly vented at the Air Force. The 500 direct, and 3,300 indirect, jobs it would have led to in Kansas are sorely missed. At one time, Wichita had more than 50,000 aerospace jobs. Today it has 39,300 (and about 4,000 at Boeing).

The could have meant $145 million a year for the Kansas economy. Given that, Larry Gates, chairman of the Kansas Democratic Party, has no reason to hold back."

 Brownback , who is campaigning for Republican presidential candidate John McCain , defended his actions  in an article found in the Wichita Eagle  entitled, "Would Kansas snub McCain over tanker?" published March 23'rd , by stating that it is :

"an entirely different picture" now, adding that Boeing paid a price for its misconduct: "There were corruption charges and people went to jail, as they should have." 

With the loss of nearly 4000 jobs at the Wichita, KS plant, partly because of Brownback's vote to open up the contract bids for military manufacturing, Brownback now has a real problem on his hands.

In politics nothing is coincidence, so one has to wonder what McCain has promised Brownback, in return for his support, and if that promise still stands if Kansas is unable to clean up this mess that he has helped create in his own homestate.

Brownback has only one thing left to fall back on now; Freedom's Frontier National Heritage Area.

The Freedom's Frontier National Heritage Area. It is the brain child of Republican Kansas U.S. Senator Sam Brownback his one time room mate former Missouri U.S. Senator "Chicken Jim" Talent.

The two Senators worked in unison to secure funding ($10,000,000 over 15 years) that would turn most of Eastern Kansas and 12 Western Missouri counties into a National Heritage Area and under the authority of the National Park Service.

A shaky plan to land $10,000,000 in Federal tax dollars over the next 15 years by creating a national heritage area in Eastern Kansas and Western Missouri, that some say threaten private property rights is all Brownback has left to help deliver Kansas to McCain in the November, 2008 presidential election, and according to one anonymous source who contacted me, Brownback is fuming mad about the lack of progress that is being made on the Freedom's Frontier National Heritage Area.

The anonymous source writes:

"One of my “deep cover” sources from Lawrence was at a meeting recently where Sen. Brownback was present.  According to my source the Lawrence Downtown Redevelopment/ Visitor’s and Convention program/Destination Management/Freedom’s Frontier scheme was mentioned.  It was reported that Brownback was fuming about the lack of progress on the projects. My source said some of the people in attendance “…just didn’t want to talk about it” to Brownback or anyone else."

Who could blame them? I'm guessing they would have rather had the 4000 well paying jobs and not had their property rights threatened by a $10,000,000 tourism scheme.

Clint E. Lacy- is a Southern author and activist, he resides in the Ozark Foothills of Southeast Missouri

contact: mobushwhacker@yahoo.com

Related: Freedom's Fraud, Learn the Truth about the Freedom's Frontier National Heritage Area

 


0 comment(s) / leave a comment

Friday, April 18th 2008

3:23 PM

The Pope Honors Southern Heritage on American Visit....


From our reader mailbag....

[CFWFwdSTR.jpg]

Thanks for the picture and a few words from myself here; it should come as no surprise to those who know their Southern History, that another Pope once thought the Cause of the Confederacy deserved honor.

From Wikipedia.Org

Pope Pius IX.

"During Confederate President Jefferson Davis’ imprisonment following the defeat of the Confederacy, Pope Pius IX sent a picture of himself to Davis with the hand-written inscription: “Come unto me, all ye who are weary and heavy laden, and I will give you rest.”[8] Along with this picture, the pope sent a miniature crown of thorns which he had woven with his own hands.[9] Such a gift, said a great niece, was “never before conferred on any but crowned heads.” Robert E. Lee, pointing to his own portrait of Pius IX whistling Dixie, told a visitor that he was “the only sovereign…in Europe who recognized our poor Confederacy"

Clint, Missouri Bushwhacker

mobushwhacker@yahoo.com  

1 comment(s) / leave a comment

Thursday, April 17th 2008

8:06 PM

Freedom's Frontier Stalling as Brownback Fumes...

An anonymous source has contacted the Missouri Bushwhacker Blog with news that it appears the Freedom's Frontier National Heritage Area has stalled.

The anonymous source also stated that people in Kansas have lost interest and that Kansas Senator Sam Brownback is fuming mad about it.

One can only speculate that the REAL reason Senator Brownback is fuming is because he represents a state with very few employment opportunities and now another one just left his state.

Part of the new Boeing Tanker plane was to be built in Wichita, and the real damning evidence is that Brownback helped drive the business away.

According to an article found in the March 23, 2008 issue of the Kansas City Star...

"In Washington, which lost the assembly jobs, Democratic Rep. Norm Dicks said, “I hope the voters of this state remember what John McCain has done to them and their jobs.”

Boeing’s protest is before the Government Accountability Office, which should issue a ruling this summer.

The Air Force said a partnership between the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. (the parent company of Airbus) and its U.S.-based partner, Northrop Grumman, won the competition on four out of five key requirements.

“I had nothing to do with the contract, except to insist in writing, on several occasions, as this process went forward, that it be fair and open and transparent,” McCain said recently in St. Louis.

But in 2003, when Congress approved his amendment that allowed the Pentagon to buy American military equipment from foreign companies. Sens. Pat Roberts and Sam Brownback, both Kansas Republicans, voted for the amendment along a largely party line."

Now Brownback is reaping what he has sewed and the people in Kansas are mad about it. The only thing Brownback has left to offer is Freedom's Frontier.

In short Brownback is dependent on selling the "legacy" of John Brown, the only problem is the people in Missouri aren't buying.

Below is the "anonymous"  tip I received today...

"One of my “deep cover” sources from Lawrence was at a meeting recently where Sen. Brownback was present.  According to my source the Lawrence Downtown Redevelopment/ Visitor’s and Convention program/Destination Management/Freedom’s Frontier scheme was mentioned.  It was reported that Brownback was fuming about the lack of progress on the projects. My source said some of the people in attendance “…just didn’t want to talk about it” to Brownback or anyone else.  The source stated that when he asked about the Civil War thing a friend of Brownback said, “Oh that, you will have to talk to someone else about it.  I’m out of that one” rolled his eyes and said he thought the whole scheme was “…dreamed up at the Hawk’s Nest or some campus bar by out of work poli-sci students and maybe a retired professor or two”.   

My source reported that he was handed the 26 page booklet “John Brown of Kansas” (presumably as evidence that progress was being made). The elaborately printed guide to the crimes of John Brown and his gang is given out free in Kansas.  Missourians are being asked to fund a project that aggrandizes the murdering psychopath John Brown who was a puppet of New England elites dedicated to destroying Missouri.  

The booklet is a one sided view of John Brown as a pioneer on the frontier of freedom.  He is depicted as a great misunderstood man who sacrificed his life freeing African-Americans slaves from Missouri but leaving the rest of the country alone.  Brown was eventually victimized and hanged by a legal system that persecuted him for doing good.  The booklet implies Brown did not want to be saved from the gallows but instead wanted to be a martyr to the cause of freedom.

This is the real foundation of the “Freedom’s Frontier” heritage project"

 

 


0 comment(s) / leave a comment